A Statement from Victoria Huyeng Myers CEO, Ice Phoenix Consulting Engineers to set the record straight

Following months of targeted public misrepresentation, including racial abuse, online harassment and reputational sabotage, I have made the decision to speak publicly.

Although I had hoped to remain silent on a resolved matter, recent coverage by SWNS (a news distributor) and The Daily Mail, published without adequate fact-checking, has made that impossible. Their narrative has caused reputational harm to both myself and my business, Ice Phoenix Consulting Engineers.

From the outset, we sought mediation with Rosa and Murray Bell as early as November 2020. This was not to engage in conflict, but simply to safeguard our property. Our intention from the beginning was resolution, not escalation.

When Rosa and Murray Bell refused mediation and failed to appoint a Party Wall surveyor, as required under UK law and the Party Wall etc. Act 1996, we acted to prevent water damage to our home resulting from their planned extension.

The boundary dispute protocol concluded within a few days of swapping surveys, after Rosa and Murray Bell admitted their legal recourse was to apply for adverse possession, which they remain ineligible.

Despite sensationalised headlines alleging 'garden theft,' these claims distort the facts. Our boundary fence was repositioned in accordance with HM Land Registry title plans. Full legal confirmation was issued in 2023, following multiple offers of mediation, all of which were declined by Rosa and Murray Bell.

Rosa and Murray Bell have shared a selective version of events with the tabloids, recycling disproven claims, while omitting key facts, including their own title deed dimensions and evidence of legal ineligibility.

The legal boundary has always been precisely defined and consistently upheld by HM Land Registry and the courts.

The selective exclusion of my husband, Michael Myers, his involvement, his company and even his photograph reflects a clear pattern. The focus is placed entirely on myself, in an attempt to discredit my professional reputation and business.

The boundary dispute concluded in 2023 with legal confirmation via HM Land Registry and the courts. Any ongoing narrative suggesting otherwise is demonstrably false. The continued publication of misleading headlines constitutes irresponsible journalism, promoting sensationalised storytelling over fact.

While tabloids continue to circulate misleading headlines online, I am compelled to release this statement to correct the public record.

This public clarification is not intended to escalate, but to correct the record with transparency and integrity.

Direct links to the dimensioned title deeds and other additional facts can be found at the bottom of this page.

https://www.truthincontext.co.uk

Legal Confirmation: Boundary Established and Claims Dismissed

In October 2023, following a failed legal claim brought by Rosa and Murray Bell, the Judge confirmed that their claims could not be made for land that they did not legally own. He ruled that the boundary fence was to remain aligned with the legal paper title boundary.

Since July 2023, the Myers’ property boundary has been positioned in accordance with the legal HM Land Registry records, and all construction has been completed within titled ownership.

Why This Matters

Articles distributed by SWNS and the Daily Mail, presented without independent verification, showcase a one-sided narrative provided by Rosa and Murray Bell. These publications have contributed to widespread misinformation, personal safety threats, and reputational harm to both my professional standing and the company I lead.

As a professional engineer and business owner, I believe in transparency, professional integrity and respectful resolution. This public clarification offers factual context in response to ongoing misrepresentation.

Clarifying the Facts Behind Misleading Tabloid Claims

Ownership and Fence Removal

CLAIM: The Myers ‘stole' Rosa and Murray Bell’s garden

FACT: The disputed area belonged to the Myers. Rosa and Murray Bell dismantled the Myers’ legal fence and installed their own fence beyond their boundary, despite advice from their own solicitor confirming they had no legal claim to that land, which remains in the Myers’ ownership.

Advance Notification

CLAIM: 'Everything was done when we are away abroad'

FACT: Before any boundary-related works began, written notice was provided to Rosa and Murray Bell. These were either hand-delivered or sent via email, providing between several days to months notice of the planned works.

Confirmations of receipt were obtained, including via their legal representatives, who had many opportunities to submit an injunction to stop the works, but all of them elected not do so.

Construction Conduct

CLAIM: 'Contractors worked on our garden'

FACT: All construction occurred within the Myers’ legal boundary, or with verbal permission from Rosa Bell for the use of the shared access between the two houses. This was witnessed and confirmed by two police officers.

Obstructions and items belonging to Rosa and Murray Bell, such as the garden shed, vehicle, patio/paving and other physical barriers placed on title land legally owned by the Myers, were trespassing.

In such cases, the Myers may remove these obstructions from their property. This legal position was also confirmed by the Judge during the hearing.

When Rosa and Murray Bell's garden shed was relocated, two police officers were present and confirmed that no damages had occurred. Two additional witnesses, a man and a woman who are friends or relatives of Rosa Bell, were also present and have verified that the shed was not damaged and that the patio and rear garden were left clear and tidy.

The Myers also sent several written notices asking Rosa and Murray Bell to remove these trespasses from the boundary, but the requests were either ignored or declined. Both of Rosa Bell's sons also refused the Myers' requests.

Shared Access Permission

CLAIM: 'No Permission' for access

FACT: Rosa Bell verbally confirmed to the two police officers present during construction that contractors were permitted to use the shared space between the two houses to complete their tasks. This was witnessed.

Boundary Dispute Protocol (BDP), Mediation Offers and Offer of a Three-Month Resolution Period

Contrary to claims that no effort was made to resolve matters amicably:

  • The Myers initiated mediation in November 2020, with multiple follow-up offers across 2021–2025

  • In 2021, the Myers invited Rosa and Murray Bell to participate in the Boundary Dispute Protocol (BDP), which they eventually accepted after initial resistance. However, they abandoned the protocol before reaching a written resolution, having admitted they would need to apply for adverse possession, for which they are ineligible under UK property law.

  • In 2023, the Myers offered Rosa and Murray Bell a formal three-month stand-down period with options for legal resolution to settle the matter amicably. These were declined.

  • Despite Rosa and Murray Bell consulting multiple solicitors, no application or legal ruling has changed the boundary status.

Rosa and Murray Bell are required to successfully apply for adverse possession if they wish to move the Myers fence from the legal paper title boundary.

Their refusal to accept the legal boundary does not change the fact that it remains clearly defined, professionally validated, and upheld by the courts.

False claim: 'Awaiting a ruling'

Since July 2023:

  • The boundary has been aligned with HM Land Registry's title

  • All construction has remained within Myers’ ownership

  • Rosa and Murray Bell's continued reliance on informal maps and speculative interpretations has not been supported by any solicitor or court

They are ineligible to apply for adverse possession, and they have repeatedly declined offers for mediation or formal legal determination.

Their public storytelling, shared with tabloids, appears to be targeted harassment using misleading media, disproportionately focused on Victoria Huyeng Myers, while reporting on very little involvement of her husband, Michael Myers.

Editorial Misconduct: 'Declined to Comment'

Tabloids claimed Victoria declined to comment, yet:

  • No article draft was shared

  • No interview or questions were issued

  • No opportunity to respond was provided, contrary to standard editorial practice

The result was a one-sided and unverified narrative, published without fact-checking or ethical journalism.

This isn’t balanced reporting. It’s narrative control without integrity.

Harassment, Police Reports & Ongoing Misrepresentation

Rosa and Murray Bells’ conduct has generated multiple police reports, including for criminal damage and racial abuse to the contractors, as well as directly at Mr and Mrs Myers.

These incidents have affected both Mr and Mrs Myers and their contractors, yet remain absent from all media accounts, including reports published by SWNS and the Daily Mail.

Ongoing Harassment and Attempted Narrative Control

Despite the resolution of the boundary matter, Rosa and Murray Bell continue to dispute the outcome, citing speculative historical maps and private interpretations.

These claims:

  • Do not override legal title

  • Do not entitle them to alter or obstruct the boundary

  • Have been consistently rejected through legal channels

Our Commitment to Professional Integrity

The reputational consequences of this false narrative have been substantial, but our standards remain unchanged.

At Ice Phoenix Consulting Engineers, we continue to prioritise:

  • Ethical practice

  • Technical excellence

  • Respectful collaboration

Thank you to those who have offered support. To learn more about our work or discuss future engineering services, please visit:

www.iphoenixce.com